Case Study: The Rise of the Nice CEO 1. Do you think Sutton is wrong and that the contrasting fortunes, and penalties, of Nardelli, McNerney, and Immelt atomic number 18 coincidental? wherefore or why not? No, I dont think Robert Sutton was wrong in his idea. To derive good tint result, CEOs must able to consider their character in the workplace. CEOs be the leaders of the political party, but it doesnt mean they feces be cruel and too dictatorial to their rank and file employees. They should shut away show to their subordinates that they should be respected, and they must have the capability to barrack their employees to be more than productive and efficient. CEOs as the head of the follow must be able to relate or drop dead to their employees well in order to implement his ideas regarding to the companys offend progress. Just like McNerney and Immelts situation who are comprehensible and understanding, well-fixed to talk to and acknowledge their employees opinion to better the companys strategies.
Unlike Nardelli, he is a fussy soulfulness and has a disreputable management. The tendency is his subordinates or employees arent impulsive comme il faut to do favors and take orders from him. Thats why their productivity in his company tends to fall. Employees show a higher cogency when they are working with a leader who is more tactful and easy going. So for me, Robert Sutton was right that if your attitude is friendly and approachable it wint be hard for you to manage your employees and it can to a fault help them improve their performance at work.If you take to acquire a full essay, or der it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.